Dr. Burak GümüşçüAesthetic & Health Technologies
Dermal Filler

5 min read

Signs of Mid Face Volume Loss: What to Look For

Signs of mid face volume loss: which findings point this way and when is an assessment sensible? A short, plain plain guide for anyone weighing it up.

The signs of mid face volume loss are usually not noticed in the mid face at all. People come in complaining about a shadow under the eye, a nasolabial fold or simply "looking tired"; that the source sits higher up emerges at the assessment. This article covers which findings point that way.

Which findings point this way?

Short answer: A shadow starting under the eye that make-up does not cover, the cheekbone area flattening, the cheek shifting downwards and the nasolabial fold becoming marked head this list.

A finding that sits alongside them is how the face reflects light. As support drops, the high points flatten, shadows deepen and the face reads as more tired with the same expression.

Another sign is a change noticed in photographs. A shift invisible when you look in the mirror day by day becomes clear in a comparison across years.

None of these makes a diagnosis on its own. What the assessment looks for is not one of them being present but several pointing the same way.

Why does it start in the mid face?

The structural layer of the face sits exactly in this area. As the fat pads and support tissue here reduce, the structure above them shifts downwards.

Change in the bone structure adds to that picture. Bone support shifts over time and changes the ground the soft tissue above it sits on.

Thinning on the skin side makes the change more visible. Skin that has thinned reveals rather than hides the volume loss beneath it.

Because all three run at once, the picture cannot be traced to a single cause and the plan cannot be reduced to a single heading.

Why is under-eye shadow linked here?

Short answer: The transition between the under-eye and the cheek sharpens when mid face support drops. The shadow that appears usually comes from the hollow that transition leaves rather than from a colour change.

The practical way to tell them apart is changing the light. A darkness driven by colour does not change much with light, while an appearance driven by shadow shifts with the direction of light.

The two headings also call for different approaches. That relationship sits in tear trough and mid face.

When does it start?

Age is not the measure on its own. Genetic ground, weight changes, sun damage and smoking can all start the picture early.

The picture appearing after weight loss is its own group. Because the lost support shows over a shorter stretch, the change is noticed more sharply.

Repeated weight fluctuations are a heading too. Support tissue stretching and slackening many times over can leave a different result from a single change.

So the decision is made on findings rather than on age. The mechanism behind hollowing sits in what causes hollow cheeks.

When is an assessment sensible?

If the findings are noticeable in daily life, if a repeating change shows in photographs, or if the under-eye shadow is not covered cosmetically, an assessment is a sensible step.

There is no rush. This is not a fast-moving process and asking for time to decide is an ordinary choice; waiting carries no medical cost.

The assessment looks for the source of the finding. Even where the complaint is about the nasolabial fold, the plan starts from the area feeding it; the wider frame sits in what is mid face filler.

Is filler discussed in every picture?

Short answer: No. Some findings relate to skin quality and some to laxity, and those call for different approaches. Filler comes up where lost support is the dominant finding.

Where there is marked laxity, filler alone does not give the expected result. Adding volume there can make the picture heavier, and that needs saying at the outset.

Findings on the skin quality side are handled separately too. Surface roughness, pigmentation and thinning are assessed with their own approaches and are not solved by adding volume. Postponing is also a medical decision; the clinic's framework sits on the mid face filler page.

Frequently asked questions

I look tired but cannot find anything specific, is that normal? It is a very common description. When mid face support drops, the high points flatten and shadows deepen, so the face reads as more tired with the same expression. What gets missed while looking for a single line or mark is usually this structural change.

Do I have dark circles or a shadow? The practical way to tell is changing the light. A darkness driven by colour does not change much with light, while an appearance driven by shadow shifts with its direction. Because the two call for different approaches, the distinction is made at an examination.

My face hollowed after losing weight, will it come back? Some of the facial volume can return when weight is regained, but that does not always happen in the same way, and where it returns cannot be controlled. Support lost with age does not return with weight. Separating those two headings is what makes the plan accurate.

What happens if I do nothing? This is not a fast-moving process and waiting carries no medical cost. Asking for time to decide is an ordinary choice. The only thing worth knowing is that as the loss of support progresses, the plan needed to reach the same result can change too.


If you would like to talk through which findings stand out on your own face, the consultation reviews the area as a whole.

This article is for general information and is not medical advice. Assessment and treatment decisions follow a medical examination; results vary between individuals.

References

  1. Skin ageing — DermNet
  2. Fillers: overview — American Academy of Dermatology
  3. Aging skin — MedlinePlus